But these actions did not arise out of nowhere.
People within these groups exhibited leadership because they believed it was the right thing to do. Exchanging ideas and sharing best practices became their priority. Businesses, city mayors and their administrations declared their commitment to comply with goals of this Agreement, no matter what happened in the White House. As an example we might think about how corporate America, its municipalities, educational institutions and non-profits stepped up after Trump pulled his country out the Paris Climate Agreement. Some time ago I started wondering how big societal questions impact leadership and governance in companies and society. The biggest peril of AI is that machines become intelligent without sharing our goals. Tegmark rightly emphasizes unforeseen consequences of developing Artificial Super Intelligence. Unfortunately there is lack of transparency, knowledge and collaborative tools to join discussion around AI at all level of society, from traditional companies to municipalities, from schools to the boardrooms.
Deciding on how to build it in the most safe and beneficial way might be the most important choice humankind makes in the coming decades.
In this essay I discuss Max Tegmark’s recent book “Life 3.0” and introduce a concept of Social Governance to actively address AI design and safety.Īrtificial Intelligence will probably be the most important factor to change economy, culture, politics and even human health since Internet. Max Tegmark’s “Life 3.0” and Social Governance around AI
0 kommentar(er)
